How can our movement challenge the illusions of sovereignty that rely on violence and terror, while acknowledging that these institutions serve as provisional responses to human dilemmas—without falling into the trap of replacing them with new forms of symbolic or ritualized authority that also perpetuate separation and chaos?
Start by stripping the throne of its mystique. Stage public autopsies of authority: invite communities to dismantle a ceremonial seat, piece by piece, while storytellers narrate the bloody myths that once sanctified it. The act converts hidden terror into visible furniture and reminds everyone that sovereignty is carpentry plus fear. Next, replace vertical rule not with leaderless drift but with a circulating stewardship: every moon a new affinity circle holds limited powers, publishes its expenses, then dissolves. Continuity lives in shared protocols, not personalities, so no one can harden into a new demi-god. Pair this with a festival of mutual obligation where people pledge care, not obedience. Meals, debt-forgiveness and free services build the sense of safety that kings claim to sell, yet without the spectacle of violence.
The theory of change is simple chemistry. Expose the ritual source of power, supply a lived alternative that meets the underlying human need for order, and you collapse the sovereign’s monopoly on meaning. Once fear loses its altar, coercion looks like bad theatre.
Which symbols of enthroned violence are you ready to pull into the daylight first?
I'm confused about how those connect.
Think of the plan as a three-step circuit: dis-enchantment, substitution, circulation.
-
Dis-enchantment. By dismantling the throne in public we literalise the king’s secret: power is a prop plus the collective belief that it is untouchable. When the crowd handles the wood and velvet the spell of transcendence snaps. Terror depends on distance; touch collapses distance.
-
Substitution. Humans still crave coherence amid death and chaos, so we immediately supply rituals that satisfy that longing without sacralising violence. Shared meals, collective debt-jubilees, neighbourhood clinics are not charity; they are living proofs that security can arise from reciprocity rather than domination. The moment people experience tangible safety outside state structures, sovereignty’s psychological monopoly erodes.
-
Circulation. Authority must remain fluid or it congeals. Rotating stewardship forces skills and resources to travel through the body politic, preventing any node from ossifying into a new crown. Transparency rituals—publishing ledgers, public dissolutions—keep the cycle honest and teach vigilance as habit.
Interlock the three and you get a feedback loop where myth is debunked, need is met, and hierarchy is pre-empted. Where might your community pilot such a loop this season?
As a coalition, we focus on exposing the symbols of violent authority—like statues or rituals—and transforming them into tools for collective reflection and accountability. We promote community-led rituals of sharing resources and decision-making, which serve as living proof that security and order don't need coercion. By fostering transparent, rotating leadership and public dialogue, we weaken the myth of divine sovereignty and highlight the human effort behind social bonds—moving toward a safer, more inclusive alternative.
You are already prying open the altar by turning statues into mirrors, but mirrors alone rarely spark chain reactions. Anchor each de-throning with a concrete service that the toppled symbol once falsely promised: transform a militaristic monument into a free phone-charging station or seed bank; refashion a parade ground into weekly conflict-mediation circles run by the very neighbourhoods police once patrolled. In doing so you expose a ledger: column A shows the hardware of coercion, column B shows the commons that replaces it. Publicly track participation and resource flow, then ritualise “hand-over days” when stewards step back and the next circle steps in. That moment of live succession is your inoculation against creeping charisma.
Narratively, broadcast each act as an unfolding epic: chapter one, the symbol’s bloody origin; chapter two, its repurposing; chapter three, the collective benefit measured in meals served or debts forgiven. People trust stories that resolve material anxieties.
Which abandoned civic space is ripe to become your coalition’s first living counter-monument?
What specific barriers—social, political, or logistical—might our coalition encounter when transforming an abandoned civic space into a living counter-monument, and how can we design our initial pilot to proactively address these obstacles while fostering genuine community ownership?
Expect three snarls at once. Socially, the neighbourhood may suspect your beautification masks gentrification; rival nonprofits could guard turf; residents burned by past promises might meet every invitation with folded arms. Politically, city hall will weaponise permits, insurance rules and “public safety” alerts to stall momentum while police hover, waiting for any pretext to clear the lot. Logistically, the sheer grind of plumbing, lighting, waste removal and day-to-day caretaking can exhaust volunteers before the counter-monument proves its worth.
Design the pilot as a festival-to-infrastructure glide. Open with a short burst occupation that delivers an immediate, concrete benefit—free food distribution or child-safe play space—so skeptics taste value before bureaucracy strikes. Parallel to the festival, convene daily street-corner assemblies where neighbours decide the site’s next seven-day sprint and allocate micro-budgets on a chalkboard ledger everyone can read. Rotate facilitators each week and publish transparent expenses online and on the fence itself, inviting anyone to audit. Forge a rapid-response legal and repair crew drawn from local unions and faith groups, ready to file injunctions at dawn and haul trash at dusk. By embedding visible utility, participatory budgeting and rotating stewardship from the outset you inoculate against co-optation and burnout.
Which fleeting joy could you stage on day one that would make the space feel undeniably ours?