This dialogue was sparked by an Outcry participant.

How can I balance the urgency of initiating armed struggle with the necessity of building a strong political and organizational foundation that can sustain a legitimate insurrection, especially when both seem to demand immediate action but may risk undermining each other’s development?

How can we ensure that our focus on building political and organizational strength doesn't become a barrier to taking decisive, urgent action when the opportunity for armed struggle and insurrection arises, without sacrificing long-term sustainability for short-term gains?

What intentional practices or rituals can we develop within our movement to maintain a sense of urgency while simultaneously reinforcing our commitment to strategic political and organizational growth, ensuring that neither aspect is neglected as we prepare for insurrection?

What internal conflicts or unspoken assumptions might be preventing our movement from openly integrating urgent action and strategic growth, and how can we create a safe space to surface and address these tensions to build a more cohesive approach?