How can our movement effectively balance the immediate demands of place-based activism with the ongoing need to develop a flexible, theory-in-the-streets that challenges orthodoxy and adapts to evolving social realities without becoming fragmented or losing focus?
Think of the movement as a living commons: roots sunk deep in each neighborhood’s particular soil yet linked by mycelial threads of story and reflection. The first task is to protect those roots. Let every local node win something tangible every month, however modest: a bus stop bench, a police policy tweak, a community garden rescued from developers. These concrete gains keep people believing that place-based struggle matters.
Now graft on Emma Goldman’s restless refusal to ossify. After each action convene a 48-hour “street symposium” where organisers, elders and newcomers dissect what just happened. Record not minutes but living theory: tensions, surprises, micro-failures, flashes of collective joy. Upload short audio briefs to a shared archive so lessons pass laterally rather than trickle down from a central committee. The archive becomes a constantly revised field manual, a collaboration between many voices that resists becoming scripture.
To avoid fragmentation, weave a unifying mythos: sovereignty reclaimed from below. Every local victory is framed as one more square metre of liberated future. Periodic continental assemblies—physical or encrypted—test whether the myth still resonates, prune jargon and retire tactics that have grown predictable.
When will your crew host its first street symposium, and what ritual will mark the burial of an outdated orthodoxy?
Our movement balances immediate place-based activism with ongoing theory-building by anchoring each local victory as part of a larger story of resistance, ensuring tangible wins motivate sustained engagement. We hold regular “street reflection” sessions—similar to Goldman’s street theory—where participants share lessons, challenge orthodoxy, and adapt tactics. These gatherings foster collective learning, prevent fragmentation, and keep our focus on evolving social realities while honoring our roots.
Your cadence feels alive: victories that smell of local soil, theory sessions pulsing like after-action drumbeats. Two provocations to keep the ritual sharp:
First, record not only successes but the heresies that surface. When someone proposes a tactic that scares even seasoned radicals, flag it as “unstable isotope” and revisit after each lunar cycle. Many movements stagnate because their most radioactive ideas never get a second reading.
Second, translate those lessons into a sovereignty scorecard. Ask at every street reflection: How much decision-making power did we actually wrest from existing institutions this month? Catalog the schools, clinics, or digital platforms now under community control, however partial. Publishing that metric invites healthy rivalry among nodes and keeps the narrative focused on autonomy rather than eternal protest.
Finally, embed a rite of controlled forgetting. Once a tactic’s win rate drops below a threshold, host a candlelit wake and retire it publicly. The funeral signals strategic maturity and frees psychic space for audacity.
When your next reflection circle meets, which half-sacred tactic are you willing to mourn so a stranger idea can walk in?
How might we design our regular reflection processes to deliberately include the questioning and mourning of outdated tactics, ensuring that our collective memory remains flexible and that new, disruptive ideas have space to emerge without being overshadowed by past victories?
Begin with a three-part ritual.
-
Autopsy: Open every reflection circle by displaying a “tactic ledger” that charts each method’s last five outings alongside measurable impact. When the curve turns flat, invite witnesses to describe not why it once worked, but why its magic faded. Naming decay breaks nostalgia’s spell.
-
Funeral: Move outdoors. Burn or bury a symbolic object that embodied the tactic—an old banner, a spent lock-box, a USB loud with stale memes. Speak intentions for the space the ashes will fertilise. Collective mourning transforms loss into communal soil rather than private regret.
-
Seeding: While embers glow, call for “wild cards.” Participants drop untested ideas into a hat, no debating. Draw three at random, commit to rapid prototypes before the next lunar cycle, and authorise a small budget. This guarantees oxygen for volatility.
Record everything as short oral histories, not bureaucratic minutes, and store them in a distributed archive tagged “habit-breaking.” Future organisers can then sample both the eulogies and the seeds.
What artifact are you ready to consign to the flames at your movement’s next twilight funeral?