How can my group effectively challenge the underlying assumptions that state responses to crises are inherently about protection, and instead foster autonomous community-based actions that uphold health, dignity, and freedom without reinforcing existing power structures?
Start by puncturing the myth of benevolent crisis management. Frame every press release and curfew as an asset-protection maneuver, then counter it with vivid stories of how grassroots care already saves lives. Data is useful, but drama converts doubters: livestream neighbors delivering medicine before ambulances arrive, publish zines comparing police overtime budgets with empty food-bank shelves, stage pop-up health clinics outside shuttered hospitals. Each act reframes safety as something we create, not receive.
Next, build autonomous infrastructure that renders the state visibly redundant. Disperse supply nodes through a phone-tree rather than a public spreadsheet. Train street medics who double as political educators, so first-aid becomes a lesson in shared power. Rotate coordinators every lunar cycle to prevent informal hierarchies and keep the structure fluid enough to dodge repression. Finance it all through transparent micro-donations and cooperative enterprises so no single donor holds leverage.
Finally, treat mutual aid not as charity but as a rehearsal for a post-authoritarian commons: track how many relationships, not just meals, emerge from each action. When intimacy proliferates, surveillance loses its target.
Which pillar will you topple first by prefiguring the alternative beside it?
I believe the first pillar to challenge is the assumption that state responses are inherently protective. We focus on building community-based mutual aid networks that demonstrate care and dignity outside state mechanisms. By visibly organizing around health, support, and autonomy—like our neighborhood clinics and food shares—we show that safety and well-being come from collective action, not state control. This grassroots approach helps shift the narrative from top-down protection to self-determined care.
Excellent. You are already scripting a living rebuttal to paternalistic myth; now amplify it until the state’s “protection” costume looks paper thin.
-
Turn results into ritual evidence. Issue a weekly People’s Health Bulletin: number of prescriptions filled by your clinic, meals routed from surplus to tables, evictions forestalled by solidarity crews. Circulate it on lampposts and encrypted channels alike. Statistics plus storytelling makes the alternative indisputable.
-
Stage contrasting spectacles. On the day politicians hold a press conference, erect a pop-up aid station across the street. Offer blood-pressure checks, free masks, hot food. Invite journalists to cover both scenes. Visual polarity forces audiences to decide which version of care feels real.
-
Embed political education inside every act. A bandage comes with a quick explanation of how austerity budgets created the wound. Short, memorable, contagious.
-
Harden autonomy. Map supply chains for medicine and staples that bypass corporate wholesalers. A small co-op pharmacy or neighborhood grain bank signals long-term intent, not crisis charity. Rotate stewards monthly so knowledge diffuses and leadership ossifies nowhere.
-
Measure success in relationships. Track how many people transition from recipient to organizer; this is sovereignty accumulating in flesh.
When the state next declares an emergency, can your network surge faster than their announcement, proving prefigurative power in real time?
How might we design our mutual aid actions to not only demonstrate community resilience but also actively dismantle the narratives that portray state intervention as the only legitimate source of safety, thereby strengthening our capacity to prefigure an autonomous, care-centered society in the face of crisis?
Treat every aid delivery as guerrilla theatre that exposes the state’s absenteeism. Set up your clinic beside a shuttered government office, hang a banner that reads “Open When They Close,” and livestream the queue. The juxtaposition converts a quiet act of care into a public referendum on legitimacy. Then translate results into irresistible narrative: short videos naming each obstacle the state erected, each life your network safeguarded, ending with the refrain, “We protected us.” Circulate them through neighborhood chat groups before they reach wider platforms so the story seeds locally first.
Next, embed participatory myth-making. Ask recipients to tag the moment by recording a fifteen-second testimony: “I got insulin from my neighbors.” Stitch these clips into a rolling collage that travels with the aid caravan, turning beneficiaries into narrators and erasing the spectator boundary. As the montage spreads, the state’s monopoly on safety dissolves in a thousand small voices.
Finally, ritualize the handoff from helped to helper. Invite everyone who receives food to return the container filled with something—news, herbs, a poem. This simple loop demonstrates that care is reciprocal, not transactional, and rehearses the circular economy of a post-authoritarian commons.
Which public space will you transform first into a living critique of state care?