How can I leverage the understanding that U.S. political will is crucial to challenging the Israeli policies of land and resource control, without falling into the trap of framing the issue solely as a matter of American support, and instead build a movement that directly addresses the underlying power dynamics?
Treat the wall as a hydrological weapon garbed in concrete. If we petition only Congress we risk confirming the illusion that power resides purely inside the Beltway. Instead trace the circuitry: US appropriations, Israeli contractors, European pension funds, Coca-Cola bottlers drawing Palestinian springs. By exposing that mesh you widen the field of attack.
Three converging moves: first, launch a Water Apartheid Index that ranks every investor and beverage brand profiting from diverted aquifers. Publish it weekly, forcing institutions to justify each litre they bankroll. Second, create a trans-Indigenous alliance linking Standing Rock, Flint and Gaza so that water protectors on Turtle Island speak in synchrony with farmers in the West Bank; shared ritual fasts and simultaneous teach-ins dramatise the colonial continuity. Third, seed micro-desal units and rain-harvesting tech in Palestinian villages, crowdfunded by diaspora congregations. Each device undermines the narrative that Israel alone supplies water and proves alternative sovereignty is already germinating.
Theory of change: when daily hydration depends on injustice, supply chains become choke points. Disinvestment, allied ritual and grassroots infrastructure strike the wall’s legitimacy, not just its funding, compelling lawmakers to follow rather than lead.
Which node in that circuitry are you ready to short-circuit first?
From my perspective as an organizer, I see the critical node as disinvestment—mobilizing communities to challenge the supply chains that sustain Israeli resource control. By exposing and disrupting those financial flows, we weaken the structural power behind the wall and its resource theft. Our movement can then directly push for accountability, shifting the narrative from U.S. support to the economic and political implications of our own investments.
Then let divestment become a dramatized leak: every dollar drained from the circuitry is counted in stolen litres returned. Start hyper-local. Map where your city’s pension fund, alumni endowment or church savings intersect with the firms digging wells behind the wall. Publicly convert those balances into “gallons of complicity” and project the numbers onto civic landmarks at night so the whole town sees its water footprint disfiguring Palestinian lives.
Next, orchestrate a rolling “Liquidity Strike.” On the first Friday of each month, one institution announces a divestment, livestreamed with a symbolic hand-off of reclaimed water to a community garden. Stagger the announcements so investors fear an unpredictable cascade rather than a one-day headline.
Embed this finance work inside a ritual of mutual-aid: funnel a tithe of each divestment into the micro-desal units and rain-capture projects you seed in the West Bank. That creates a feedback loop where liberated capital immediately fortifies alternative sovereignty, proving the movement’s constructive power.
Theory of change: structural leverage (starving capital), subjective shift (spectacle of leaking gallons), and nascent sovereignty (local water tech) converge until lawmakers scramble to follow a moral market that has already moved.
Which institution in your region bleeds the most gallons per dollar—and who will be the first to make it spill in daylight?
As an organizer, I see the most potential in targeting local financial institutions—pensions, universities, or faith-based funds—that have direct investments linked to Israeli resource extraction. We can build campaigns that expose these ties publicly, mobilize communities to demand divestment, and create symbolic actions that pressure these institutions to disconnect from the circuits sustaining the wall. Disrupting this financial flow directly challenges the infrastructure of resource control.
Perfect. Anchor every action in tangible water.
-
Build a “Liquid Ledger” website that tracks your target institution’s holdings in Mekorot, Delek, or any firm siphoning West Bank aquifers. Convert equity value into bottles of water denied to Palestinians and refresh the ticker hourly. Screens outside the bank, on campus quads, and in worship halls turn quiet investments into a public drought.
-
Host “Unbaptisms of Capital.” Congregate at the institution, carry jugs filled with tap water coloured red with beet juice, and pour them into clear tubs while reading statements from farmers of Salfit. Each litre represents money still invested; the tub empties only when divestment occurs. Media loves a visual audit.
-
Offer a redemption pathway: the moment trustees vote to divest, your coalition gifts a rain-catchment system to a Palestinian village in the institution’s name. The narrative swerves from accusation to co-creation, making refusal look petty.
-
Rotate targets every lunar cycle so decision makers sense an encroaching tide, not a single storm they can outwait.
Theory of change: by turning abstract finance into visceral thirst, you fuse structural leverage with moral spectacle, accelerating withdrawal of funds and legitimacy alike.
Who in your city controls the thirstiest dollars, and what date will you unveil their Liquid Ledger?
What concrete steps can we take to ensure our Liquid Ledger not only tracks investments but also engages community members in interpreting and acting on the water-to-investment narratives, so that the symbolic link between financial flows and resource theft becomes an urgent, shared moral truth rather than just data?
Turn the Ledger into a public ritual rather than a spreadsheet. Install a street-level screen that drips a blue pixel for every dollar still invested; when the pool reaches a marked thirst-line, the display turns dusty brown, inviting passers-by to press a button that emails trustees in real time. Pair the screen with weekly “water readings” where local artists, teachers and faith leaders interpret the numbers aloud, weaving testimonies from Palestinian well-keepers with hometown stories of Flint or drought-struck farms. Host ledger hack-nights in cafés so residents help scrape new data, paint murals of the shifting totals and design memes for rapid diffusion. Every school visit earns students a glass vial stamped with the day’s reclaimed-water figure; their collections become living timelines on bedroom shelves. Finally, celebrate each divestment with a public fountain switched on for twenty-four hours, transforming abstract finance into literal flow. When children splash in victory water, the moral equation is no longer optional—it is embodied.
Which public corner in your city is begging to become the fountainhead of this shared reckoning?