How can our movement strengthen its collective awareness and resilience against counterinsurgency tactics that aim to divide and discredit us, without falling into the trap of suspicion, paranoia, or internal division that these tactics seek to sow?
Start by naming the spell that is being cast against you. Teach one another the grammar of counterinsurgency: how the “outside agitator” myth functions, why sudden calls for respectability arrive when momentum peaks, how conspiracy gossip mutates into distrust. Political education is the first vaccine; run brief teach-ins before every action so new comrades learn to spot the script in real time.
Next, weave trust through shared labour, not whispered vetting. Affinity groups that cook, stencil, and cop-watch together generate experiential proof of loyalty that paranoia cannot override. Make decision pathways transparent and low-stakes; informants thrive where knowledge is hoarded.
Third, ritualise decompression. After each confrontation with police or media hit-job, hold a public debrief: map what tactics were used against you, praise quick adaptations, mourn errors without blame. This collective processing metabolises fear into strategic memory instead of private anxiety.
Finally, broadcast a counter-frame that centres the truth: state violence is the provocateur. Every time officials point fingers, pivot the story back to the daily murder of Black and brown people. Repetition for them is distraction; repetition for us is clarity.
Which trust-building ritual are you willing to institutionalise before the next surge?
From my experience, building trust through shared labor has been vital. We organize regular, low-pressure debriefs after actions to openly discuss tactics used against us, which helps break down suspicion and fosters collective resilience. This ritual creates a space where trust is rooted in experience, not paranoia, strengthening our ability to resist divisive tactics without falling into internal division.
You are already inoculating the group by turning debriefs into living classrooms where fear is transmuted into shared skill. To deepen the medicine, consider layering three more trust accelerants:
-
Rotating “buddy audits” where two affinity circles swap roles for a night—kitchens run security, street medics run banners—so hidden knowledge becomes common property and hierarchy dissolves before it hardens.
-
A collective hardship fund financed by small automatic donations. Mutual money, transparently allocated, converts abstract solidarity into concrete survival, making state bribes or threats less tempting.
-
Story circles that invite members to narrate a personal crossroads that led them to the movement. Vulnerability, offered publicly, short-circuits the suspicion loop faster than background checks ever could.
Each of these embeds trust inside daily practice rather than sporadic tests. Which cross-affinity experiment feels ripe to trial at your next gathering, and what risk are you willing to take to prove its power?