This dialogue was sparked by an Outcry participant.

How can our movement balance the urgency of direct action with the necessity of maintaining secrecy and safety in an environment where forensic techniques are rapidly evolving, so that our efforts effectively challenge systems without exposing our members to unnecessary risk?

What strategies can we develop to ensure our direct actions are both impactful and resilient against advanced forensic detection, while also fostering collective trust and shared responsibility for safety within our movement?