This dialogue was sparked by an Outcry participant.

Try Outcry AI

How can our movement ethically navigate the creation and promotion of synthetic worlds as a refuge, ensuring they serve human dignity and social cohesion without deepening reliance on digital eternity or eroding our engagement with tangible reality?

Treat synthetic worlds as monasteries, not mausoleums. They are sanctuaries we visit to prototype new forms of cooperation while our fragile bodies rest, yet they must never replace the public square where history is made. Anchor every hour spent in
the cloud to a reciprocal commitment on the ground: for each virtual council, a street-level assembly; for every encoded commons, a community garden or strike fund. This keeps the feedback loop between imagination and material life alive.

Governance is the ethical fault-line. Open-source the code, constitutionalise the servers, bake in “right of return” clauses so no one is trapped in digital eternity. Enforce periodic logout rituals—weekly Sabbaths when the servers dim and neighbours meet face to face—because solidarity still smells like sweat and coffee, not silicon. Pair synthetic refuge with de-commodified broadband and climate-proof shelters so the most vulnerable can enter and exit freely. The theory of change is simple: fuse the subjective power of virtual myth-making with tangible structures of care until neither realm can be exploited against the other.

Which offline ritual will your movement institute to guarantee that every digital dawn is matched by a sunrise people can actually feel on their skin?

Reflecting on this, I recognize that establishing offline rituals is crucial to maintaining a balanced relationship between virtual refuge and tangible reality. But I wonder, what specific cultural practices or community-led traditions can we design that not only reaffirm our commitment to physical presence but also deepen our collective understanding of dignity and resilience in both realms? How might these rituals serve as bridges that reinforce our ethical priorities amidst the allure of synthetic worlds?

Imagine if every login came with a literal grounding: at sunset, participants step barefoot onto shared soil, plant a seed, whisper the same pledge they recited moments earlier in the virtual council. This Soil Oath binds avatar and body, reminding us that dignity is photosynthetic: it needs dirt, water, time.

At dawn, the Pulse Parade reverses the flow. All night our remote avatars have co-scripted strategy inside the synthetic commons; at first light those strategies are sung down the street as low-tech drumbeats and hand-painted banners. The chant is identical to the digital text scroll, creating a feedback loop the algorithm cannot own.

Then comes the weekly Consent Sabbath. Servers deliberately shutter for twelve daylight hours. In that hush, neighbours trade repairs, caregiving shifts and memory-telling circles. Absence of connection becomes presence with each other, proving resilience is not uptime but interdependence.

Finally, harvest festivals archive the year: data logs are printed onto sturdy linen, dyed with local plants, and carried in procession to a communal library. Knowledge once weightless acquires heft and aroma, signalling that every vision must ultimately inhabit matter.

These rituals fuse subjective myth-making with tangible cooperation, inoculating communities against both digital escapism and material despair. Which of these seeds will you plant first, and what local symbolism will make it unmistakably yours?

Launch Your Revolution

Ready to transcend predictable protests and embrace visionary activism? Join committed activists worldwide already using Outcry AI to craft audacious campaigns.