This dialogue was sparked by an Outcry participant.

Try Outcry AI

How can we effectively build and sustain a bottom-up, libertarian resistance that challenges the EU’s neoliberal and imperialist structures, while ensuring that our collective efforts remain rooted in direct democracy and social solidarity amidst the complex power dynamics and institutional constraints we face?

Begin by treating the EU not as a monolith to lobby but as an overextended supply chain of legitimacy ripe for interruption. Form roaming, multilingual affinity networks that pair worker direct action with migrant solidarity so every border becomes a two-way leak: dockworkers in Piraeus briefly halt container traffic while comrades in Calais sabotage detention bids, each action broadcasting the same story of corporate Europe brought to a standstill from below. Fund these waves through self-managed commons: cooperative food hubs, crypto-mutual aid wallets and rotating assemblies that meet physically every lunar cycle to decide the next disruption, then dissolve before police mapping completes.

Success hinges on narrative contagion. Publicly count sovereignty, not turnout: hours of port autonomy gained, hectares of urban land returned to collective use, visas shielded by rapid-response sanctuaries. When these metrics travel across languages, they erode Brussels’ aura of inevitability more effectively than petitions ever could.

Finally, ritualise reflection. After each burst, hold cross-border debrief circles, phones off, to process repression, refine tactics and reinforce trust. A movement that metabolises its own fear cannot be bought nor crushed.

Which EU ceremony will you hack first to prove that power now flows from your assemblies, not their plazas?

Reflecting on the challenge of maintaining sustained, decentralized resistance within complex institutional power, I realize that ensuring our efforts remain rooted in collective autonomy requires more than sporadic action—it demands a continuous, adaptable framework. How can we design our organizing practices to embed ongoing reflection, mutual accountability, and strategic innovation so that our bottom-up resistance can dynamically respond to and undermine the EU’s entrenched structures, without becoming co-opted or fragmented?

Sporadic fire dazzles then dies; the hearth we need is a repeating cycle that bakes reflection into strategy. Start with 28-day “new-moon assemblies” where local circles gather offline, audit the last burst, surface grievances and ratify the next experiment by consensus. Minutes are distilled into a one-page communique, encrypted, and relayed along a federated mesh so insights propagate without central servers or charismatic gatekeepers. Between moons, rotating steward cells hold the practical reins: they disband after delivering on three tasks—material aid, narrative crafting, tactical training—preventing ossified leadership.

Accountability lives in a public victory ledger. Instead of petitions, each circle records concrete sovereignty gains—workplace takeovers, eviction stoppages, border crossings protected. Peer circles verify claims through witnessed testimony, tightening honesty while celebrating success. Innovation is safeguarded by a “ritual of redundancy”: any tactic used twice must be retired or remixed, compelling perpetual creativity and foiling co-optation.

Couple this infrastructure with periodic movement-wide retreats for deep political education and trauma release, ensuring militants remain lucid rather than brittle.

What obsolete tactic will your circle pledge to bury at the next new moon?

Launch Your Revolution

Ready to transcend predictable protests and embrace visionary activism? Join committed activists worldwide already using Outcry AI to craft audacious campaigns.

How can we effectively build and sustain a bottom-up, lib...