How can I navigate the tension between staying committed to revolutionary ideals like anti-fascism and anarchist principles, while also managing the disillusionment and repression faced after defeat, without compromising the integrity of our movement’s long-term vision?
Defeat is a crucible, not a gravestone. The German anarcho-syndicalists who bled beside the CNT learned that repression can either petrify a movement or refine it into a harder alloy. The first task is narrative: reframe loss as data, proof that pure voluntarist courage is insufficient without parallel institutions able to outlive battlefields. Preserve the ideals by housing them in structures the state struggles to crush: worker cooperatives, clandestine mutual-aid funds, encrypted assemblies. Each is a seed vault for the next cycle of uprising.
Second, ritualise decompression. Trauma unspoken curdles into sectarian blame. Create periodic gatherings where veterans recount both victories and mistakes, recording them for future rebels. This inoculates against the creeping myth that defeat was inevitable.
Third, diversify lenses. Pair your anti-fascist street readiness with cultural projects that shift common sense and with structural tactics that sap fascism’s material base. A triangle of force—voluntarist, subjectivist, structuralist—keeps the vision intact even if one side collapses.
Finally, cultivate strategic patience. The Spanish libertarians scanned months; we must scan decades. Revolutions are marathons disguised as sprints.
Which institutional embryo are you willing to plant now so that, when the next repression strikes, your ideals already have somewhere to live?
How can we design and nurture a resilient organizational structure now—such as clandestine networks, community alliances, or cultural spaces—that embodies our revolutionary ideals, so that even in the face of repression and disillusionment, our movement can persist, adapt, and eventually reignite the struggle?
Begin with a three-tier lattice.
-
Cells of 5-7 people who trust each other offline, meet in rotating homes, and steward a single concrete task: a mutual-aid pantry, a bail fund, a clandestine printshop. Keep membership stable; let projects, not personalities, travel between cells. This smallness limits infiltration and preserves initiative.
-
A federated commons where those cells converge: a cooperative venue, a community garden, or a makerspace disguised as a hobby club. Its public face offers plausible deniability yet encodes anarchist ethics in daily practice: horizontal decision rules, solidarity pricing, shared childcare. Revenue from the commons finances the hidden cells, turning overt culture into covert infrastructure.
-
A narrative sanctuary, both digital and ritual, that archives lessons and myths. Use encrypted servers for raw documentation, then transmute key insights into art exhibitions, podcasts, zines. Culture becomes the movable fortress that outlives raids, exile, even despair.
Theory of change: sovereign micro-institutions seed alternative authority; federated culture normalises them; stories broadcast viability, inviting replication. Repression then scatters spores rather than uprooting trees.
Which tier feels least developed in your context, and what first experiment could you launch this month?
In our movement, I see the most need in developing the federation of community alliances and cultural spaces. This layered approach creates resilience by embedding our ideals into daily life and social fabric, making them harder to eradicate. Our first experiment could be establishing a clandestine mutual aid group that also doubles as a cultural gathering—building trust, sharing resources, and planting the seeds for broader federated networks, even under repression.
Start with a public-facing pretext that feels utterly ordinary: a weekly neighborhood skill-share where people fix bikes, swap recipes and play folk songs. Behind that convivial veil, embed a sliding-scale food fund, a hardship micro-grant and an encrypted signal loop for rapid alerts. The festival masks the pantry; the laughter hides the logistics. Cultural warmth recruits hearts before ideology cross-examines minds.
Next, braid these gatherings across town through “guest nights.” Each cell hosts another’s musicians or cooks, producing a hopping circulation of bodies, stories and trust. Because the venue changes, surveillance chases ghosts; because the rituals repeat, newcomers intuit the ethos without pamphlets. Map these nodes on a private cryptographic ledger so if one falls, the rest can re-route support within hours.
Over time, spin the network outward: lend equipment to strikers, offer rehearsal space to immigrant choirs, archive oral histories in a roving zine cart. Every service exchanged is a filament in a hidden federation, an underground scaffold of mutual obligation.
What small, joyous invitation could you extend this week that feels harmless to outsiders yet secretly weaves the first strand of that city-wide web?