How can I, in my organizing, better recognize and amplify the ways that challenging bisexual stereotypes might threaten dominant social structures, while also navigating the tensions between framing bisexuality as revolutionary and avoiding reinforcing harmful myths that marginalize bisexual folks?
See bisexuality not as an identity to defend but as a strategic glitch in the regime of binaries. Patriarchy, capitalism and heteronormativity all rely on clean partitions: male–female, producer–consumer, family–market. Bisexual bodies leak across those walls, proving the partitions fictional. Your task is to dramatise that leak while refusing the caricature of the promiscuous chaos-bringer.
Anchor organising in three moves. First, narrative inversion: publish testimonies that link bi fluidity to care work, mutual aid and sustainable kinship, spotlighting responsibility rather than excess. This disarms the hypersexual trope and reframes fluid desire as a discipline of relational abundance. Second, ritual visibility: stage “both/and” pop-ups—public cuddle libraries, bi-led skill shares, dual-gender drag parades—where participation blurs labels in real time. Each event pre-figures a social order whose categories are porous. Third, coalition leverage: insist every campaign against wage inequality or police violence names bisexual liberation as part of its horizon. The binary that polices bodies is the same one that polices streets; expose the link and you expand the battlefield.
Measure success not in crowd size but in how many people begin questioning any either/or. Which binary in your community is ripest for sabotage through unapologetic bi presence?
The tension between framing bisexuality as inherently revolutionary and avoiding reinforcement of harmful myths unsettles me because I worry that emphasizing its destabilizing potential might inadvertently exoticize or marginalize bisexual folks further. How can we craft organizing strategies that confidently highlight bisexuality’s challenge to social norms without unintentionally reinforcing stereotypes that isolate or stigmatize those who don’t fit that revolutionary narrative?
Treat bisexuality less like fireworks, more like groundwater: silently reshaping the landscape beneath every house. Revolution need not be loud to be real. Begin with “radical ordinariness” campaigns that foreground daily routines of bi people—paying rent, caring for elders, mentoring teens. By broadcasting these untheatrical stories you normalise fluidity while revealing how quietly it corrodes binary foundations.
Next, replace myth-busting with myth-remixing circles. Rather than denying stereotypes, dissect their social function, then reforge them into tools of agency. If the trope says bisexuals are “fence-sitters,” reclaim that vantage: the fence becomes a lookout from which to spot cracks in patriarchy. Participants craft slogans and visuals that flip stigma into strategic insight.
Finally, weave bi presence into broader justice work through “Both/And clauses.” Every coalition press release appends a line recognising multiplicity of gender, desire and family. This embeds fluidity into collective demands, preventing isolation while training allies to speak a more porous politics.
Theory of change: when the mundane makes multiplicity feel inevitable, the system’s categorical pillars loosen. Which everyday space—a grocery aisle, a union meeting, a faith gathering—could you infiltrate with a whispered Both/And this week?
As an organizer, I see challenges to bisexual stereotypes as a way to subtly undermine the societal walls that confine us. I focus on normalizing everyday bisexual experiences—shared stories of care, community, and resilience—so the revolutionary feels less like an exception and more like the norm. By weaving bisexuality into broader struggles, I aim to challenge binaries without making anyone feel alienated or exoticized, keeping the focus on collective transformation.
You are already prying open the binary by making bisexual life feel unremarkably present, and that ordinariness is precisely what rattles a system addicted to neat categories. To deepen the seepage, rotate three lenses on every action:
-
Visibility of labour. Highlight the caregiving, union organising and neighbourhood chores done by bi people. When fluid identities are seen holding the social fabric together, the hypersexual myth collapses under its own caricature.
-
Cross-pollination rituals. Pair bi storytelling with adjacent fights: a tenants’ meeting begins with a short zine on chosen-family housing, a climate march features a banner reading “Planet thrives in diversity of species and loves.” The metaphor writes itself.
-
Metrics of mingling. Track not headcounts but the number of new spaces where bi presence feels natural: scout troops, mosque study circles, credit-union boards. Each site colonised by comfortable plurality is a crack in the wall.
Where is the most unexpected venue in your city that could host a quietly bi-led act of public service next month?